at Browning
Technology is most powerful when it deepens what makes us human — curiosity, dialogue, and connection. This guide describes how Browning approaches technology and digital life at every stage of a boy's education, and how families can partner with us.
Reclaiming Focus: Building Attention in an Age of Distraction is Browning's ongoing community initiative studying how screen time, attention, and digital life shape boys' learning and well-being. It began with a 360° study of student screen time across all three divisions and continues through community conversations, faculty development, and this guide.
Attention.
We define it as the disciplined act of being fully present and open to the world around us — without distraction or isolation. It is the capacity that makes all learning possible: the ability to read deeply, to listen carefully, to think without rushing, to sit with a hard question long enough for something real to emerge.
Attention is also the capacity most under threat. The devices, platforms, and algorithms that surround our students are designed — with extraordinary sophistication — to capture and fragment it. We take that seriously.
The Reclaiming Focus Initiative is not a one-time study. It is Browning's ongoing commitment to treating attention as a school-wide systems problem — and to building a school where boys learn to think deeply, be present fully, and act with intention.
We are studying how attention develops across boyhood, auditing how screens are used in our classrooms, designing school-wide defaults that protect attentional capacity, and partnering with families to create consistent norms at home and at school. We measure what works. We report what we find. We improve every year.
Reclaiming Focus is not anti-technology.
It is pro-human learning.
AI will shape the future our students inherit — but focus, discernment, and inquiry shape how it's used. Students need time and space for curiosity, discussion, storytelling, reflection, and in-person learning. These human skills are what allow technology to amplify learning, rather than fragment it.
At Browning, we don't believe any single tool is always the right one. A pencil and paper, a conversation, a whiteboard, a book, and an AI model each have a place in a student's education. Our job is to know the difference — and to teach our students to know it, too.
Its findings confirmed what we already believed: our community is ready to talk, and eager to build practical alternatives. Families are not asking us to solve home life. They are asking for partnership and better defaults.
Browning has made deliberate choices about which AI tools are used, by whom, and at what grade level. Those decisions are grounded in our central commitment to protecting attention. Details on supported platforms are available for faculty and staff through the Technology office.
"Not all screen time is the same. Watching a show with your son builds connection. Scrolling TikTok alone at midnight fragments attention, identity, and belonging. Our job is to know the difference and to help boys know it too."
— Aaron Grill, Director of Innovation and TechnologyData sources: Student survey (194), parent survey (55), faculty survey (35), advisory discussions, and parent coffees across all three divisions.
Digital Life at Browning grows from a genuine community effort. It was shaped by the AI Task Force — a board committee that established Browning's philosophy and platform decisions around artificial intelligence. Details on supported platforms and faculty expectations are available through the Technology office. This guide is grounded in Reclaiming Focus: Building Attention in an Age of Distraction, a Browning community initiative and ongoing practice of listening, learning, and building better defaults together. It began with a 360° study of student screen time across all three divisions and continues through community conversations, faculty development, and this guide.
The content has been reviewed and informed by Browning's Student Support Team, Wellness Team, College Guidance, Library Staff, and the Parents Association Committee on Screentime — the people who see our students most clearly and know what families actually need. It is produced by the Collaborative Learning Cohort, a faculty professional development program in which teachers collaborate across disciplines to deepen their practice and develop curriculum, led by Danielle Passno alongside Aaron Grill.
This guide will be updated annually as our community continues to learn.
Connecting Screens vs. Isolating Screens
Not all screen time pulls attention in the same direction. A boy watching a film with his father is sharing an experience — his attention anchored by presence and story, his nervous system synchronizing with another person's. A boy gaming alone at midnight is in a loop engineered to prevent him from stopping. Both involve a screen. Only one involves another human being.
Attention is not just the capacity to focus — it is the capacity to be present with someone. The question we ask at Browning is not how many hours, but whether the screen is pulling a boy toward connection or away from it. Research from Dartmouth (Nature Communications, 2023) found that people watching TV together show measurable physiological and emotional synchronization — the same bonding response as shared conversation. Isolating screen use, by contrast, is associated with anxiety, withdrawal, and reduced family cohesion.
Students and parents experience screentime differently.
Average ratings on a 1–5 scale (low → high) across 194 students and 55 parents. Students see more connection potential. Parents see more isolation risk. This gap is where shared language matters most.
Strengthens relationships & learning
Leads to isolation & disconnection
1–5 scale (low → high) · Reclaiming Focus Initiative 2026–2027 · n=194 students, n=55 parents
Rate screens as more likely to strengthen relationships and learning. They see connection potential where parents see risk.
Rate screens as more likely to lead to isolation and disconnection. They see isolation risk where students see connection.
Right Tool, Right Time
At Browning, we don't believe any single tool is always the right one. A pencil and paper, a conversation, a whiteboard, a book, and an AI model each have a place in a student's education. Our job as educators — and your job as parents — is to know the difference, and to teach our students to know it, too. Some work happens without screens. Some conversations happen without devices. Some of the best thinking starts with a blank page and a good question.
The Core Four
Browning's academic approach is organized around four practices that develop the whole learner. These appear as badges throughout this guide to show which skills are most emphasized at each grade level.
K–12 Digital Life Themes
No single tool is always right. Pencil and paper, conversation, books, and AI each have a place in a Browning education. Our job — and yours — is to help boys know the difference.
Building Healthy Habits at Home
Families are not asking us to solve home life — they are asking for partnership and better defaults. The structures below are drawn from Reclaiming Focus research and family feedback. They are suggestions, not requirements. The goal is shared language and shared systems.
Family Technology Plan
- Where do devices charge at night? (Outside bedrooms.)
- What are screen-free times in our home?
- What platforms is my son on, and do I follow him?
- What group chats is he in?
- When does he earn more independence with devices?
- Revisit this plan each year as your son grows.
Group Chat Guidance
- Know which group chats your son is in
- Talk about what "digital dignity" means in group settings
- Discuss what to do when a chat goes in a bad direction
- Consider no group chats before Grade 8
- Review Browning's community standards with your son
- The "would I say this in person?" test still works
Device Routines That Work
- Phone charging outside bedrooms — for everyone
- Screen-free meals as a family norm
- Device use in common spaces, not bedrooms
- Evening collection as a default, not a punishment
- Apple Screen Time and Google Family Link for younger students
- Consistent weekday and weekend routines
Talking About AI
- Ask your son: "Did AI help with that? How?"
- Discuss what AI is good at — and what it can't do
- Model honest disclosure: "I used AI to help draft this"
- Talk about AI-generated content and why it requires skepticism
- Celebrate original thinking — stories only he can tell
- Connect Browning's expectations to your home values
Learning begins with attention — and attention is built long before a screen appears.
The early years are the most critical time for developing imagination, language, social skills, and the capacity for sustained focus. These capabilities are cultivated through conversation, play, hands-on experience, and the steady presence of caring adults — not through screens. Technology, when it appears in K–2, is purposeful, brief, and teacher-directed.
At Browning, we believe a Kindergartener who has learned to sit with a question, wrestle with an idea, or listen to a peer is already developing the most important skills he will need — including the skills to use AI well, years from now.
Key Objectives
Family Engagement
- No 1:1 personal devices
- Teacher-supervised use only
- Phones: not permitted
📱 When is a screen too early?
The AAP recommends no screens beyond video chat before age 2, and limited high-quality content for ages 2–5. Neural pathways for sustained attention are built through play and conversation — not screens.
AAP Screen Time Guidelines; NIMH Brain Development Research🧠 Attention as a skill
Attention is not fixed — it's a capacity built through practice. Every time a child sits with a question before getting an answer, that capacity grows. Screen-light early childhood builds the focus that makes all later learning possible.
Reclaiming Focus Initiative, 2025–26; Jonathan Haidt, The Anxious Generation🎮 Not all screen time is equal
Cooperative games requiring verbal communication differ meaningfully from solo passive content. Key questions: Is your son talking to someone? Does he choose screens when offline options are available? Can he stop when asked?
Common Sense Media, Media Balance & Well-Being Research🤖 "What is AI?" — age-appropriate
K–2 students already encounter AI-generated content in videos and games. Start simply: "A computer made that picture." Curiosity is the goal, not anxiety.
Common Sense Media Digital Literacy Curriculum, K–2Boys learn to ask better questions — and to evaluate the answers they find.
In grades 3 through 5, students begin developing the habits that distinguish a researcher from a passive consumer of information: skepticism, source evaluation, and organized thinking. Technology serves these goals when chosen intentionally — and pencils, notebooks, and books remain essential tools alongside it.
This is also the period when AI enters the conversation as a concept. Students don't use AI independently, but they begin to understand what it is, how it works, and why thinking critically about it matters. The goal is curiosity — not anxiety or uncritical acceptance.
Key Objectives
Family Engagement
- No 1:1 personal devices
- Teacher-directed use only
- Limited take-home for specific assignments
- Phones: off and stored
🔍 "Is this real?" — Media literacy
By 3rd grade most boys have encountered AI-generated images or misleading content. Teaching healthy skepticism — "Who made this? Why? How do I know?" — is the foundation of every research skill they'll use for life.
Common Sense Media Digital Literacy Curriculum, Grade 2–3🤖 Deepfakes and AI-generated content
AI tools can now generate photos, voices, and videos of real people. Third graders encounter these without knowing it. Start with fun examples: "Not everything you see was made by a human."
Common Sense Media; MIT Media Lab on AI literacy for youth📱 The smartphone conversation
4th and 5th grade is when smartphone pressure peaks. Research supports delaying introduction as long as possible. The Wait Until 8th pledge works when families in a grade agree together.
Jonathan Haidt, The Anxious Generation; waituntil8th.org🎯 Algorithms and attention
By 4th grade boys can understand: apps are designed to keep you watching. Teaching boys to notice when they've "lost time" on a screen is a precursor to self-regulation.
Center for Humane Technology; Common Sense Media💬 Group chat entry points
Many 4th and 5th grade boys enter group chats for the first time. Browning recommends no peer group texting before Grade 8. The social pressure is real — but developmental readiness isn't yet there.
AAP, "Group Chats and Middle Schoolers"; Browning Reclaiming Focus Initiative 2025–26🔒 Privacy and digital citizenship
This is when boys first create accounts, share photos, and communicate digitally. Key concepts: personal vs. private information, passwords, what "public" means, and how to handle receiving something uncomfortable.
Common Sense Media Privacy & Security curriculumThe years when independence expands faster than self-regulation — and structure matters most.
Middle school boys are seeking autonomy while their executive function is still developing. This gap is where habits form — for better or worse. Technology at this stage is structured and purposeful. Browning's use of ReMarkable tablets in the Middle School replaces 1:1 laptops, reducing distraction while preserving the digital utility students need for serious academic work.
AI enters academic life here — cautiously and with clear expectations. Boys learn what AI can and cannot do, how to disclose and cite its use, and why original thinking still matters. Reclaiming Focus data shows that students themselves prefer real connection and meaningful work — they're asking us to provide alternatives to screens. This is our answer.
Key Objectives
Family Engagement
- Shared sets — intentionally not 1:1
- Supports attention and shared norms
- Phones: off and stored all day
- No personal laptops at school
💬 Group chats — the #1 issue
Exclusion, jokes that cross lines, racism, misogyny, and bias all happen in group chats — and spill into classrooms. Screenshots escalate conflict. Parents who see partial threads become involved in ways that prolong harm.
Browning Reclaiming Focus Initiative; Cyberbullying Research Center 2023 (55% lifetime experience)🤖 AI — first real academic encounters
6th–8th grade is when AI moves from concept to tool. Browning's expectation: supervised use with full disclosure. The deeper question: is AI scaffolding curiosity, or replacing it?
Browning AI at Browning policy; Mollick & Mollick, Practical Guide to AI in the Classroom📲 Social media entry points
Most platforms require age 13 — but many 6th graders are already on them. Browning recommends delaying as long as possible. If introduced: one platform only, with parental follow access.
Jonathan Haidt, The Anxious Generation; AAP social media guidance; Pew Research 2023😴 Gaming and late-night screens
Gaming at 6–8 often migrates to late at night. Sleep disruption affects mood, academic performance, and impulse control. Charging outside the bedroom is the highest-leverage family intervention.
Haidt, The Anxious Generation; AAP adolescent sleep guidelines; Browning parent survey data🔍 Boys alone online
Boys are getting answers to questions from AI, TikTok, and Reddit — often late at night, without those questions being validated or challenged. If school isn't the place where curiosity is taken seriously, where does that happen?
Richard Reeves, Of Boys and Men; Browning Reclaiming Focus essay, A. Grill 2025🧠 Brain development reality
The prefrontal cortex — responsible for impulse control and reading social tone — isn't fully developed until the mid-twenties. A 6th grader genuinely cannot read tone in a text the way an adult can. This is developmental, not a character flaw.
NIMH Teen Brain Research; NIH Prefrontal Cortex Development studiesTechnology access expands alongside demonstrated responsibility — and AI becomes a genuine scholarly tool.
Upper school students are developing the mature digital judgment that will serve them in college and in their careers. Technology access expands in 9th and 10th grade as students demonstrate the self-regulation and integrity that justify it. AI is now a real part of academic life — not a shortcut around thinking, but a tool that can sharpen it, when used well.
Faculty using AI in the classroom at Browning focus on the quality of the questions students ask, not just the polish of the answers they receive. AI works best when it scaffolds curiosity — and that's how we use it. Students who learn to ask better questions will be prepared to lead, not just to use, the tools of the future.
Key Objectives
Family Engagement
- Chromebook for research and production
- ReMarkable for writing and notes
- Phones: classroom expectations apply
🤖 AI in academic work — honest conversation
9th and 10th graders use AI for homework, brainstorming, and first drafts. Browning's position: full transparency required. The habit to build: "can you explain what AI contributed and what you contributed?"
Mollick & Mollick, Practical Guide to AI; UNESCO AI and Education, 2021🔍 Asking better questions
Faculty using AI at Browning focus on the quality of questions students ask — not just the polish of answers. The distinguishing skill is the ability to interrogate, evaluate, and take genuine intellectual ownership of what AI produces.
Browning AI Taskforce philosophy; Ethan Mollick, Co-Intelligence (2024)🌐 Digital footprint — starting to matter
College admissions officers report social media checks are increasingly common. Time to audit: Google your son's name. What comes up? Is it the story he wants to tell?
Kaplan Survey on College Admissions and Social Media 2023; NACAC😴 Sleep and screens
The CDC recommends 8–10 hours of sleep for teenagers. Late-night gaming and device use are the most common disruptors. Sleep deprivation affects mood, judgment, academic performance, and impulse control online.
CDC Adolescent Sleep Guidelines; Browning Reclaiming Focus parent survey dataThe question is no longer whether to use AI — it's when, why, and how to evaluate what it produces.
Seniors leave Browning as emerging adults. They use the full range of digital tools — and they are expected to bring to that use the discernment, integrity, and intellectual confidence that a Browning education has cultivated. AI is a genuine part of their academic and creative work. So is the judgment to know when not to use it.
The habits that will define our graduates are not technical — they are human. The capacity to sit with a hard question, to research with rigor, to tell a story that only they could tell, and to engage in honest dialogue with peers and mentors: these are the things that will distinguish a Browning graduate in a world full of generated content. We believe our boys are ready.
Key Objectives
Family Engagement
- Full access with demonstrated responsibility
- Device choices follow classroom expectations
- Phone: mature personal judgment expected
✍️ The college essay — yours alone
The college essay is the clearest test of authentic voice. AI can help brainstorm — but the story, specific details, honest reflection, and voice must be genuinely his. Admissions officers are reading for exactly that.
Browning College Counseling; NACAC guidance on AI and college essays 2024🤖 AI discernment — the senior standard
The standard at this level: "Can you evaluate, interrogate, and take genuine intellectual ownership of what you produced?" AI-generated work that a student cannot explain or defend is not their work.
Browning Academic Integrity policy; Mollick, Co-Intelligence (2024)🌐 Digital footprint — adult stakes
At 17 or 18, the digital footprint has adult consequences — in college admissions, internship applications, and how employers will find them. Google your son's name together. What comes up? Is it the story he wants to tell?
Kaplan College Admissions and Social Media Survey 2023📰 News literacy and AI misinformation
The information environment seniors will navigate in college is saturated with AI-generated content. Skills to develop: identifying credentialed sources, recognizing AI fabrications, and maintaining a standard of evidence before sharing.
Stanford Civic Online Reasoning (cor.stanford.edu); News Literacy Project (newslit.org)